More than 3 Seconds

A forum to discuss what makes art good, bad, or whatever other word you want to use

Sunday, November 14, 2010

Art or Not? #1

This is the first in what hopefully becomes a series of posts titled Art or Not. I am going to present a controversial artist/topic/exhibition/etc. You get to decide if it is art or not. Share your thoughts, please.


Today's Topic: Shepard Fairey
He gained national attention during Barack Obama's 2008 presidential campaign, creating a poster that even garnered praise from Obama himself. Since then he has been criticized for not having artistic talent, but, maybe worse, for being a plagiarist. The "Hope" Obama poster was made from a photograph owned by the Associated Press, and which is the artistic work of photographer Mannie Garcia taken in 2006. At the start of the controversy the AP director of media relations announced that the "AP has determined that the photograph used in the poster is an AP photo and that its use required permission." Without the AP's permission the photograph became an icon worldwide, posters were selling on Ebay for upwards of $500, and Shepard Fairey became famous. So the AP sued. The AP claims infringement on its copyright and wants "payment for the use of the photo and any money he makes from it." The New York Times explains further. Fairey replied with a lawsuit of his own, claiming that the AP photo was only the starting point for his art and that he went on to create a "stunning, abstracted and idealized visual image that created powerful new meaning and conveys a radically difference message." (For more on Fairey's artisic point of view see his website obeygiant.com)

Here are the two images side by side. What do you think?


Under such intense scrutiny, Fairey's entire artistic career has come under attack. He has also had exhibitions at the Institute of Contemporary Art Boston, the Warhol Museum, the Stolen Space Gallery in London, and the Contemporary Arts Center Cincinnati. So did plagiarism gain him unearned fame beyond his wildest dreams? Or is the AP unjustly using its might on a borderline case of fair use art and First Amendment rights?

Listen to some of the experts argue:



What do you think?

p.s. In the name of fair attribution, I got the title of this post from the video and the images from here.

1 comment:

  1. While I agree that the painting Fairey did looks a bit like the AP photo of President Obama, so do a whole lot of other pictures. If it had been a photo of him holding a specific item, etc and the painting had the same object in the same position, then fine, claim plagiarism. But really...how different does the AP expect Fairey make the President work?!

    ReplyDelete